|
Following the discovery of DNA in 1953 and the
development of the first genetically modified plants in the early
1980s, it became urgent to introduce legislation to regulate the use
of this new technology. The European Union therefore adopted two new
Directives, one covering genetically modified organisms and the other
covering the contained use of genetically modified micro-organisms.
Directive 90/220/EEC on the Deliberate Release of
Genetically Modified Organisms to the
Environment was adopted on 23 April
1990, for transposition into the national legislation of Member States
by 1992. The Directive laid down procedures under which GMOs could be
released into the environment, either for experimentation (e.g. field
trials) or for commercialisation (market release). Approval for
deliberate release of GMOs required the involvement of the designated
Competent Authorities in all EU Member States. In the event that
Member States could not reach agreement about approval, however, the
decision reverted to the European Commission.
As gene technology developed and biotechnology
companies moved very rapidly to bring GMOs onto the market, it became
evident in the early 1990s that Directive 90/220/EEC would have to be
amended. On the one hand, industry complained that it was too
restrictive and that the bureaucracy involved in product
authorisations made it difficult for them to get their GMOs approved.
On the other hand, NGOs and others concerned about the effects that
GMOs might have on the environment and consumer health felt that the
directive was not rigorous enough, and that the authorisation
procedure needed to be improved.
18 GMOs, including soya, maize and oilseed rape
varieties, have already been approved for deliberate release under
Directive 90/220/EEC.
12 others are pending approval.
The revised directive
After several years of proposals from the European Commission and
discussion in the European Parliament, the EU finally adopted a
revised Deliberate Release Directive 2001/18/EC which entered into
force on 17th April 2001 and must be transposed into the
national law of Member States by 17th October 2002.
Although the new directive is a considerable improvement over the
previous one, in the view of many it fails to address some of the key
issues such as GMO pollution (contamination of other plants by GMOs),
liability of GMO producers and use of antibiotic-resistant marker
genes.
See FoE's assessment of the revised directive below.
Although the text mentions the need for traceability,
the Directive itself fails to deal with the problem of traceability of
GMOs with the aim of facilitating product labelling and providing a
means for product withdrawals should problems occur. For this reason,
at the time the Directive was adopted by the European Parliament,
several Member States declared that they would block new GMO approvals
until the question of traceability and labelling, and even liability,
had been resolved (see
Moratorium).
The European Commission, therefore, started work to prepare new
Proposals for two new EU Regulations,: one on
Traceability/Labelling of GMOs and the other on
GM Food/Feed. The latter Regulation
will set out authorisation procedures for GMOs approved for use both
in human food, replacing the present authorisation procedure under the
Novel Food Regulation, as well as in animal feed where the use of GMOs
is currently not regulated at all.
Other authorisation procedures
Not all GMO authorisations are dealt with under the Deliberate Release
Directive and there is indeed a fear that, with time, more and more
GMOs will be approved under so-called vertical legislation for food,
feed, seeds, etc., thus by-passing more stringent rules which may
apply under Directive 2001/18/EC. This is already the case under the
Novel Food Regulation 258/97 which allows GMOs to be put on the
market in human food and food ingredients. Under this Regulation,
several GMOs have already entered the food chain according to a
simplified procedure which just calls for companies to demonstrate
that their GM food or food ingredients are "substantially equivalent"
to conventional foods.
FoE's assessment of the new Deliberate Release
Directive
On the positive side, the revised directive:
-
requires direct and indirect, delayed and immediate
adverse effects of GMOs on the environment or human health to be
taken into account;
-
extends the risk assessment to include cumulative
long-term effects on human health and the environment, including
biological diversity and effects on non-agricultural eco-systems;
-
requires Member States to ensure traceability of GMOs
at all stages of placing on the market;
-
improves labelling requirements, replacing the former
"may contain GMOs" by the less ambiguous "this product contains
GMOs".
-
requires mandatory
monitoring of GMOs released for commercial or any other
purpose;
-
requires public registers concerning the locations
where GMOs are grown for commercial or experimental purposes;
-
limits GMO approvals to 10 years after which
authorisations must be renewed;
-
requires that any unauthorised GMO releases must be
terminated;
-
allows thresholds only for adventitious or
technically unavoidable traces of authorised GMOs
-
changes the existing authorisation procedure under
which the European Commission could act against the wishes of Member
States.
On the negative side, the directive:
-
fails to bring in immediate bans for antibiotic
marker genes (ARMs) used in GMOs, extending authorisation for ARMs
until 2004 for commercial releases and 2008 for experimental
releases;
-
does not address the problem of GMO pollution but
simply says that adverse effects of gene transfer should be assessed
on a case-by-case basis;
-
exempts medicinal products and compounds from the
scope of the legislation;
-
allows individual Member States to accept long-term
multi-site notifications for experimental releases;
-
retains the existing simplified authorisation
procedure for plants, and introduces an option to propose new
simplified "differentiated procedures" for GMO releases and for GMO
products;
-
steamlines authorisation by imposing shorter
deadlines for decision-making;
-
requires a centralised authorisation procedure to be
examined in 2003;
-
fails to provide a liability regime for damage caused
by GMOs.
Find the legislation
Council Directive 90/220/EEC of 23 April 1990 on
the deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified
organisms
Official Journal L 117 , 08/05/1990 P. 0015 -
0027
http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/en/lif/dat/1990/en_390L0220.html
Directive 2001/18/EC
of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 March 2001 on the
deliberate release into the environment of genetically modified
organisms and repealing Council Directive 90/220/EEC
Official Journal L 106 , 17/04/2001 P. 0001 - 0039
http://europa.eu.int/eur-lex/en/lif/dat/2001/en_301L0018.html
Regulation
(EC) No 258/97 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27
January 1997 concerning novel foods and novel food ingredients
Official Journal L 043 , 14/02/1997 P. 0001 -
0006
http://europa.eu.int/comm/food/fs/gmo/gmo_legi_authorise_en.html
|