![]() |
|
| JOINT PRESS RELEASE Tuesday 27th of May 2003 Environmental groups warn that EU enlargement could weaken policy on GMOs Brussels
– 27 May 2003 – A report released today warns
that the lack of implementation of GMO laws in accession
countries could result in GMOs unapproved in the EU, flooding
the EU market after accession. The report entitled: “EU
Enlargement - the introduction of GMOs by the back door of EU
accession?” outlines the difficulties accession countries face in trying
to harmonise their laws on GMOs used in food and agriculture, with the EU patchwork of legislation that is constantly
under review, All the accession countries of Central-Eastern Europe (CEE) have now transposed all but the most recent EU GMO legislation. However, most of these countries lack any means to implement their laws on GMO authorisation and labelling. Only the Czech Republic and Hungary have state laboratories certified to detect GMOs in seed, food and feed. “What GMOs are circulating on the markets of these countries is a big unknown, as there are no monitoring programmes to check compliance,” said Iza Kruszewska, of ANPED, The Northern Alliance for Sustainability, an NGO network that released the report. “Poland, the largest of the new Member States requires authorisation and labelling of GMOs, but has no means to enforce these requirements,” said Ela Priwieziencew, from the Polish NGO, Socio-Ecological Institute. “In early 2002, Poland authorised the import of Monsanto’s genetically engineered soybeans and (Bt) maize for use as animal feed, but to this day there is no certified laboratory to check what is really being imported and if it is labelled,” she explained. “Already in 2001, we found a soya product in Poland sold by the Polish company Santé, containing 4% genetically engineered soybeans – without any authorisation or labelling. Although we alerted the authorities, nothing was done to take these products off the market,” she added. Despite their poor implementation, many provisions in the laws of CEE accession countries address gaps in EU law or go further than EU legislation. For instance, the GMO laws in Poland and Slovakia provide for liability. Vera Mora, from the Hungarian NGO ETK gives another example: “Hungarian legislation on GMOs allows for the creation of genetic protective zones. We must be allowed to retain this provision to protect organic and non-GM farmers in Hungary from GMO contamination.” The
Slovene GMO law provides a safeguard clause that allows
Slovenia not to automatically
authorise all the GMOs already approved in the EU. According
to Marjana Dermelj, from the Slovene NGO Umanotera: “Where there
are concerns about potential biodiversity or other impacts,
the Environment Ministry can re-assess
the risk of releasing the GMO – even one
approved in the old EU15 - into Slovenia’s ecosystems.”
However, Dermelj doubts this provision will be applied: “Seven
years of legal
"The
biotech companies with the support of the US government
have moved into Central and Eastern
Europe in a big way, seeking to avoid the more rigorous
legislative framework of the EU; most successfully in
Poland - the most US-friendly new EU Member State," said
Geert Ritsema of FoE ----------------------------------- Tomorrow Friends of the Earth Europe -together with the Greens, EURO COOP and the Heinrich Boell Foundation- is organising the conference" GMOs: co-existence or contamination ?", that will be held in the European Parliament. More than 175 participants are expected, among them representatives from the retailsector, farmersorganisations, consumerunions, MEPs, Commission officials, biotech industry and environmental NGO's. For more details and the latest version of the programme, please see: http://www.foeeurope.org/GMOs/conference/home.htm Friends
of the Earth is the largest grassroots environmental
network in the world |