Back
Dramatic rise in EU emissions
New data shows: European governments are failing badly
to face up to the challenge of global warming
Brussels, 21 June 2005: Friends of the
Earth Europe called on EU governments to drastically increase their
efforts to combat global warming by reducing domestic greenhouse
gas emissions, as shocking new data released today by the European
Commission shows a dramatic increase in emissions. In 2003, EU-15
emissions were only 1.7% below 1990 levels, while Kyoto requires
to achieve minus 8%. Almost half of the emission savings achieved
until 2002 have been lost in 2003. [1]
The worst performer among the EU-15 member
states are Austria, Denmark, Ireland, Portugal and Spain. [2]
The new data raises doubt on how serious EU Member States are in
their attempts to avoid catastrophic climate change, the impacts
of which are increasingly felt across the globe already today, mostly
by poor people in developing countries who had no role in creating
the problem. [3]
Jan Kowalzig, climate campaigner at Friends
of the Earth Europe said:
Friends of the Earth also emphasised that
according to Article 3.2 of the Kyoto Protocol, countries "shall,
by 2005, have made demonstrable progress in achieving its commitments".
In light of this, the new figures released today look even more
embarrassing. In a new report published today, Friends of the Earth
Europe assesses where policy measures are far beyond real needs
to put the European economy to low-carbon. [4]
When looking at the history and the composition
of emission reductions achieved so far, it becomes even clearer
that EU policies are failing. The Carbon Dioxide emissions, only
one out of six gases covered under Kyoto, keep rising since about
1992 and are now 3.4% above 1990 levels. The only noteworthy reductions
to date happened as a consequence of the economic breakdown in Eastern
Germany after the reunification and fuel switching from coal to
gas in the UK in the 1990s. Without this 'free lunch' the failure
of EU climate & energy policy would be even more obvious.
Jan Kowalzig continues:
Friends of the Earth also criticised that governments too often
overlook the huge economic benefits from switching to clean energy.
The European Commission said that the benefits of avoiding catastrophic
climate change will clearly outweigh the costs of abatement policies.[5]
Also, governments too often look at the interests of individual
companies or sectors while they should be looking at the economy
as a whole. For example in Germany, support mechanisms for renewable
energies actually save money for both public and private budgets:
in 2003, the money spent for all support mechanisms for renewable
energy -- such as feed-in tariffs or market incentives -- was lower
than what taxpayers would have paid for environmental damages or
increased health care costs, if that energy had been generated from
conventional and not from renewable sources. [6]
CONTACTS
Jan Kowalzig, climate campaigner at Friends of the Earth Europe
phone: +32-2-5426101 or +32-473-510147
email: jan.kowalzig@foeeurope.org
NOTES
[1] The new figures are the greenhouse gas emission figures from
2003, as the data always comes with a delay of two years. They show
that while in 2002, emissions in the EU-15 were 2.9% below 1990
levels, in 2003 they were only 1.7% below 1990 levels. In order
to meet the requirements of the Kyoto Protocol, EU-15 emissions
must be on average at least 8% below 1990 levels between 2008 and
2012. A "linear target path" drawn from 1990 to 2010 in
order to meet the Kyoto target shows that in 2003 emissions should
have been 5.2% lower than they were in 1990, instead of the meagre
minus 1.7%. The official data is available at http://org.eea.eu.int/documents/newsreleases/ghg_inventory_report-en
[2] The table below lists for each EU-25 country its Kyoto target
relative to 1990 levels as well as the current 2003 figures (in
brackets), exposing Austria, Denmark, Ireland, Portugal and Spain
as being off the track by the widest margin. Almost all New Member
States have drastic reductions in their emissions and will meet
their targets -- but not as a consequence of intelligent policies
but of economic change of the 1990s:
EU-15 total -- Kyoto: -8% (2003; -1.7%)
Austria -- Kyoto: -13.0% (2003: +16.6%)
Belgium -- Kyoto: -7.5% (2003: +0.6%)
Denmark -- Kyoto: -21.0% (2003: +6.3%)
Finland -- Kyoto: +/-0.0% (2003: +21.5%)
France -- Kyoto: +/-0.0% (2003: -1.9%)
Germany -- Kyoto: -21.0% (2003: -18.5%)
Greece -- Kyoto: +25.0% (2003: +23.2%)
Ireland -- Kyoto: +13.0% (2003: +25.2%)
Italy -- Kyoto: -6.5% (2003: +11.6%)
Luxembourg -- Kyoto: -28.0% (2003: -11.5%)
Netherlands -- Kyoto: -6.0% (2003: +0.8%)
Portugal -- Kyoto: +27.0% (2003: +36.7%)
Spain -- Kyoto: +15.0% (2003: +40.6%)
Sweden -- Kyoto: +4.0% (2003: -2.4%)
United Kingdom -- Kyoto: -12.5% (2003: -13.3%)
New Member States
Cyprus -- no Kyoto target (2003: +72.2%)
Czech Republic -- Kyoto: -8.0% (2003: -23.4%)
Estonia -- Kyoto: -8.0% (2003: -50.8%)
Hungary -- Kyoto: -6.0% (2003: -31.5%)
Latvia -- Kyoto: -8.0% (2003: -58.5%)
Lithuania -- Kyoto: -8.0% (2003: -66.2%)
Malta -- no Kyoto target (2003: -+29.1%)
Poland -- Kyoto: -6.0% (2003: -32.1%)
Slovakia -- Kyoto: -8.0% (2003: -27.9%)
Slovenia -- Kyoto: -8.0% (2003: -2.9%)
[3] Developing countries will be hit first and most, increasingly
suffering from droughts, water shortages and crop losses, settlements
devastated by hurricanes or flooding or the spread of tropical diseases.
More than a million species will become extinct as a result of global
warming. Europe will also be hit. The 2003 heat wave or the Central
European floods were a taste of what Europe will have to face. The
European Environment Agency published an assessment on the impacts
in Europe, available at http://reports.eea.eu.int/climate_report_2_2004/en
[4] "How the European Union responds to the global threat
of climate change". An assessment by Friends of the Earth Europe;
Brussels, May 2005; available at http://www.foeeurope.org/climate/download/EU2005CLIMATE.pdf
[5] "Winning the battle against global climate change";
Communication from the European Commission, February 2005; COM(2005)
35 final. Trade commissioner Peter Mandelson also noted that the
Commission "does not expect any major negative competitiveness
impacts from EU climate policies", in a reply to an oral question
H-0123/05 by MEP Caroline Lucas, March 2005 in the European Parliament.
[6] About EURO 1.1 billion compared to about EURO 1.2 billion. See: Forecast
scenarios for the Potential Role of Renewable Energies; Wolfram
Krewitt, Joachim Nitsch; German Aerospace Centre; available at http://www.europarl.eu.int/workshop/renewable/addocs/krewitt-en.pdf
Friends of the Earth Europe
campaigns for sustainable and fair societies and for the protection
of the environment,
unites more than 30 national organisations with thousands of local
groups
and is part of the world's largest grassroots environmental network,
Friends of the Earth International.