![]() |
|
Press Release
|
||
|
Polish
Institute of Environmental Economics |
|||
|
Andrzej Gula, from the Polish Institute on Environmental Economics, commented, "Compared to the current 2004-2006 plan, the proposed National Development Plan is much more advanced and it incorporates important policy instruments to eliminate development gaps in Poland. However, there are still areas of the NDP which require significant changes. Among them is the proposed over-emphasis on new road building which is set to completely overshadow much-needed investments in sustainable transport schemes such as the promotion of the railways." Out of the EU's Cohesion Fund, Poland plans to use at least EUR 15.3 billion for transport infrastructure and only EUR 5.3 billion for the environment during the seven-year period. This would run contrary to the practice since the establishment of the Cohesion Fund in 1993 where the fund's resources have always been split 50-50 between transport and environment. Within the proposed transport budget in Poland, at least EUR 11.2 billion from the Cohesion Fund would be used for roads and only EUR 4.1 billion for railways, despite the EU's official aim, as per the 2001 White Paper on Transport, of shifting transport from roads to rails. The NDP proposal comes at a time when the Polish government is closing some of its railway lines due to a lack of investment funds for railway rehabilitation and modernization. The Cohesion Fund is only part of the overall road bias in Poland's proposed EU funding allocations, with further billions for road-building set to be invested from the EU's structural funds, the national budget and private sources. [3] The draft Polish NDP comes ahead of crucial decisions about the future of the EU's cohesion policy and the EU budget in the 2007-2013 period. [4] Although the allocations, rules and priorities for the EU funding have not yet been decided, member states are already preparing their plans for using the EU funds. The plans will still have to be approved by the Commission, probably in the first half of 2006. Data shows that Spain, Portugal and Greece, until now the main beneficiaries of EU funds, were still economically lagging behind the EU-15 average despite having also invested EU funds into extensive road building projects. Ireland, although it has invested relatively less into transport infrastructure and more into human capital and its knowledge economy, has overtaken the rest of Europe. Yet even Spain, Portugal and Greece have always used the Cohesion Fund equally for transport and environment infrastructure. Magda Stoczkiewicz, of CEE Bankwatch Network and Friends of the Earth (in Brussels), said, "The Commission must demand that Poland changes its plan for using EU funds. EU taxpayers' resources should not be used by any country in violation of the EU's commonly agreed objectives, such as decoupling economic growth from transport growth, shifting transport investment from roads to rail and achieving Kyoto targets in reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Poland's draft NDP shows that when the Council, Parliament and the Commission come to negotiate the new regulations and strategic guidelines for the 2007- 2013 period, they must set strong common priorities to ensure that future EU funding is not used irresponsibly or against the environment." Andrzej Gula added, "The Polish government's plan would seriously
jeopardise its own commitments to meet EU environmental standards.
The investment focus for the EU and Polish funds should be weighted
towards new technologies, education, energy efficiency, renewable
energy sources, and sustainable public transport instead. An
|