Back
EU Commissioners must heed Council critics
on GMOs
Brussels, 11 April 2006 -EU Commissioners will
be making a grave mistake, Friends of the Earth Europe and Greenpeace
warned today, if they ignore the strong criticism levelled by member
states on the way GMOs are currently authorised in the EU. The
Commission, which has persistently refused to acknowledge any problems
in the process, will hold a debate on GMO policy tomorrow, Wednesday
12 April.
"The GMO authorisation process must be halted until it is truly
independent and fulfils legal requirements," said Eric Gall of
Greenpeace. "The European Commission has ignored the failings of
its system for far too long, but must now listen to member states
and allow for a stringent, transparent and independent risk evaluation
of GMOs."
The Commission's internal discussion follows a public debate in
the Environment Council on 9 March, where a vast majority of member
states criticised the current GMO authorisation procedures. Member
states urged the Commission to improve the implementation of EU
GMO legislation and risk evaluation, in particular for long-term
effects on health and the environment. They called for more transparency
and questioned the appropriateness of using 'comitology procedures'
to decide on GMOs, which leave all power to approve them with the
Commission even when most EU governments is opposed.
At tomorrow's debate, DG Trade, DG Industry and DG Research are
expected to try and prevent a change in Commission policy. Mr Mandelson,
Mr Verheugen and Mr Potocnik have previously used the threat of
the World Trade Organisation (WTO) dispute on GMOs to justify a
position in favour of the biotech industry. However, the preliminary
ruling of the WTO panel (1) reveals that the panel dismissed many
of the claims of the US, Canada and Argentina and, crucially, did
not rule on the right of countries to set strict biosafety regulations.
"Nothing in the WTO ruling prevents the Commission from supporting
strict rules for the authorisation of genetically modified products,
including the evaluation of long-term effects on health and the
environment," said Helen Holder of Friends of the Earth Europe.
The Commission can no longer use the WTO to justify its automatic
approval of all GMOs for the sole benefit of the biotech industry."
Greenpeace and Friends of the Earth Europe argue that the legal
requirements to evaluate long-term effects of GMOs and to take
into account scientific uncertainties and member states' objections
have been so far been ignored by the European Food Safety Authority
(EFSA) and the European Commission. GMOs are solely assessed on
the basis of data provided by the applicant company, most of which
is kept secret as 'confidential business information'. This lack
of transparency is in breach of EU law and prevents the public
and independent scientists from examining the risks of a GM (genetically
modified) product.
Contacts :
Eric Gall, GMO policy director, Greenpeace European Unit,
+32 (0) 496 16 15 82
Helen Holder, European GMO campaigner, Friends of the Earth Europe,
+32 (0) 474 85 76 38
Notes:
(1) Leaked on 28 February by Friends of the Earth, see: http://www.foeeurope.org/biteback/WTO_decision.htm